![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Far as I'm concerned, you can EITHER have an invite-only party OR you can advertise your party.
But it's FUCKING RUDE to advertise your invite-only party.
Don't mind invite-only parties. Don't even mind invite-only parties who, apparently, were going around handing out invites only to women who were dressed slutty. Heck, if someone took that to the extreme, and walked around the con handing out slips of paper which said, "You're sexy. Come to my room at 11 pm," that wouldn't bother me. And if he or she got people to show up, more power to him or her.
DO mind people who do that and also put posters up in the stairwells advertising their party. It's fucking RUDE to do that, then set up a velvet rope outside, and do the "club" thing. Dunno about you, but I go to cons to get away from that kind of dynamic.
Yes, I'm pissed off at not being pretty enough to get into that party.
But it's FUCKING RUDE to advertise your invite-only party.
Don't mind invite-only parties. Don't even mind invite-only parties who, apparently, were going around handing out invites only to women who were dressed slutty. Heck, if someone took that to the extreme, and walked around the con handing out slips of paper which said, "You're sexy. Come to my room at 11 pm," that wouldn't bother me. And if he or she got people to show up, more power to him or her.
DO mind people who do that and also put posters up in the stairwells advertising their party. It's fucking RUDE to do that, then set up a velvet rope outside, and do the "club" thing. Dunno about you, but I go to cons to get away from that kind of dynamic.
Yes, I'm pissed off at not being pretty enough to get into that party.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:51 am (UTC)I do agree with you though. Next time (aka next year) find me and I'll take you as my date. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:55 am (UTC)But I think that's a bit different than a mundane "club"/"Hot or Not" bit.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 06:10 am (UTC)In 1987, I was still in highschool...
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 06:52 am (UTC)I'm sorry, but ... bwah-hah-ha-hah-BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
That's just so special, right there.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 12:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 12:52 pm (UTC)Okay, with that name, I feel embarrassed about being upset to not get in.
Apparently, I'm shallow and insecure. But, y'know, whatever.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:ooh!
From:One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-15 11:24 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 01:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 04:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 01:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 03:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:00 pm (UTC)Hell, I didn't own clothing like that when I was active in the scene. If people want to play with me, they're going to play with me, not my clothes.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-15 11:15 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 12:22 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 01:35 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:(no subject)
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 05:36 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 01:50 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 02:09 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:42 pm (UTC)I'm used to private parties at con being relatively discreet to avoid hurt feelings by those not invited.
This crowd plastered posters all over the con, with the restrictions in small type near the bottom. I certainly never noticed them until after we were turned away and I read one of the posters closely.
I don't have my Clear Ether with me to see whether they were included in the party list, but with such restrictions, they shouldn't've been.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 02:08 pm (UTC)I can think of worse people to sulk with, mind you. It might have been fun.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 02:51 pm (UTC)For that matter, I suspect I'd mind less if someone advertised a party with posters saying something like "you must be wearing a short skirt or kilt" and applied it to everyone, regardless of gender. I still wouldn't get in (I don't own any short skirts, and probably wouldn't take a pair of shorts to Arisia, given the time of year), but it wouldn't feel quite as much like yet another example of het guys making rules to give them lots of conventionally pretty female skin to look at, while not providing eye candy for people who'd rather look at men, or making the men meet any requirements.
Hmmm. "Short skirts or evidence of having showered within the last hour", anyone? (I have a hunch that the guys who organized that party would have trouble getting into a similar party in the outside world.)
One of the Party Hosts
Date: 2007-01-15 11:49 pm (UTC)Some of our male friends probably were inviting only hot chicks I can't deny it, but our lady friends also had invites to hand out so it should have evened out.
Just for the record, we're NOT a fetish party, NOT a BDSM party (though we support the right of anyone to their lifestyle), but fetish wear is certainly skanky and usually gets through the door check. Not reeking is also a plus, we do our best to keep out the BO. I was voted down on using the sniff test as criteria, but luckily the overlap between folks in costume that also neeeeeed a shower seems to be acceptably small.
Oh & the girls (and guys) who organized this party organize and are invited to a lot of other parties all year long, we all shower regularly, and the het guys on the party committee had awesome space theme costumes thank you very much.
Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:Re: One of the Party Hosts
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 03:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 12:48 am (UTC)I also was turned away, not sure why, and someone I know who was not dressed up, (well was in a tankish top and pants) was given a private invite.
Not having a private party wing did hurt a bit. But yes, you have a choice if you have advertising, your expected to be open. Lesson learned.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 01:08 am (UTC)Invites were distributed all day friday and saturday, perhaps your friend was in costume when they received the invite, or perhaps their regular attire looked costumelike to our friends, or, I hate to say it, perhaps one of our menfolk took a shine to your friend and just wanted to see them again. The folks paying for the party do get handed their own ration of invites and we can't really control who gets one. The best costumed person at Con could get missed if we just don't run into them.
Anyway sorry about that, we probably weren't even supposed to poster at all but never even thought of it while thinking up what names should be on the poster and what font would look best and where could we get a big one made etc. etc. I apologize for our D'oh! moment. We sort of thought people would think our posters were awesome. In retrospect I think we missed an angle. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 01:58 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I'm 99.99% sure it's a Cambridge / Boston ABCC thing ...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 06:04 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-01-16 06:05 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 02:24 am (UTC)Only real issue I see here is having "skank" in the party title, which last time I checked was a rather insulting term... seems to me it would be more of a diss to be let in than kept out anyway. I'm surprised noone got assaulted for calling someone one by handing them an invite.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 02:38 am (UTC)Closed parties I don't have that much of an issue with so long as they follow the rules and don't mess things up for the con (e.g. the way one of "Those" parties nearly did at Snow-Con when I was Arisia inkeeper.) These days, closed is usually synonymous with "serves alcohol."
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 04:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 04:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 05:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 08:42 pm (UTC)