As many of you know, I hate Hannukah
Dec. 9th, 2005 09:44 pmSo I've been looking for things I could like about Hannukah -- ways to redefine it, make it something OTHER than a simple "yay our repressive theocracy killed their repressive theocracy."
As usual, I discovered that the Rabbis got there first.
That's something I can get behind much more easily.
As usual, I discovered that the Rabbis got there first.
When Adam [the first human] noticed that the days were getting shorter, he said: "Is the world becoming darker because of my sins? Will it soon return to chaos? And this is what God meant when He punished me with mortality?" He prayed and fasted for eight days. When the period prior to the winter solstice arrived, he saw that the days were now growing longer. He realized: This is the way of the world. Adam then made eight days of celebration. (Talmud Avodah Zarah 8a)
That's something I can get behind much more easily.
On the eagle-like reflexes of eagles
Dec. 1st, 2005 12:11 amSo, as most of you know, Theresa and Patrick Nielsen-Hayden have a blog, http://www.nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/
TNH linked to Cutting down The Great Tree of Avalon, where someone found an excerpt of an unbearably bad fantasy novel, and decided to comment on it, line-by-line.
Funny stuff, of course. But as we were reading, a couple bad guys were apparently attempting to kidnap an eagle-boy, and we got to the line:
But not before the boy awoke. With eagle-fast reflexes,
to which the commentator snarked, "Oh yes. Eagles are known around the world around for their reflexes."
I laughed at that, and told Lis that I knew all about eagle reflexes. My friend Charles had told me about them.
I haven't seen Charles Sheehan since high school, really -- I ran into him once on the street a couple years after that, but I don't think I've seen hide nor hair of him for probably nearly ten years. But I'll tell you this story of him, nonetheless:
( The Story of Charles and the Eagles )
TNH linked to Cutting down The Great Tree of Avalon, where someone found an excerpt of an unbearably bad fantasy novel, and decided to comment on it, line-by-line.
Funny stuff, of course. But as we were reading, a couple bad guys were apparently attempting to kidnap an eagle-boy, and we got to the line:
But not before the boy awoke. With eagle-fast reflexes,
to which the commentator snarked, "Oh yes. Eagles are known around the world around for their reflexes."
I laughed at that, and told Lis that I knew all about eagle reflexes. My friend Charles had told me about them.
I haven't seen Charles Sheehan since high school, really -- I ran into him once on the street a couple years after that, but I don't think I've seen hide nor hair of him for probably nearly ten years. But I'll tell you this story of him, nonetheless:
( The Story of Charles and the Eagles )
On bad science and my brain
Nov. 28th, 2005 10:54 amSo,
wcg has been doing daily science trivia questions, which are a lot of fun. And I've gotten NONE of them right.
Now, he's finally asked a question I actually DO know the answer to. Because it's about WRONG science:
I knew that one. Because it doesn't actually involve science.
If you know the answer, answer it in Bill's journal, here, rather than in my journal. I'm not doing the trivia quizzes after all -- Bill is.
But it's sad to realize that I know how that substance works, aether works, the four humors work. . . .
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, he's finally asked a question I actually DO know the answer to. Because it's about WRONG science:
. . . [D]uring the 17th century, a new theory of combustion developed. This theory identified a new element, though some thought it might be a special kind of earth, which was contained within all things that could be burned. After burning, the ash was considered to represent the purified substance, after all of this burnable element had been released.
Today's question: What was the name of this theoretical substance?
I knew that one. Because it doesn't actually involve science.
If you know the answer, answer it in Bill's journal, here, rather than in my journal. I'm not doing the trivia quizzes after all -- Bill is.
But it's sad to realize that I know how that substance works, aether works, the four humors work. . . .
So far today:
Nov. 21st, 2005 10:16 amDropped Boopsie off at the vet so they can take X-rays of her bladder and look for bladder stones -- also gave them a list of other things that we've noticed for them to look at while they've got her.
Drove Lis to work. On the way, passed a sign in someone's yard saying "MOVING -- TAKE WHAT YOU WANT."
Stopped back at the yard giveaway after dropping Lis off. They're just moving down the street, but are using it as a chance to clean out some of their unused junk. I got a small bag of trinkets that will be good Student Bribes for Good Behavior -- we've been choosing one student each week who behaves the best, and giving them a reward. Things like a superball, a small packet of crayons, stuff like that. Some things are pretty cool: when my cousin
kyshwn was moving, I took a couple pewter miniatures that he was throwing out. Now I've got a Chinese fan, a couple of those spinny-drum things like they had in that scene at the end of Karate Kid II, stuff like that. I thanked the guy who was moving, and told him that, as I teach Sunday school, I'm always on the lookout for these sorts of trinkets for my kids. He asked me what religion, and I said Jewish. (I must look obviously Jewish -- I mean, I usually assume that as I say I teach Sunday school, people will assume that I mean Christian, and not think to ask. I don't really mind one way or the other, but I find it amusing that people tend to not assume stuff like that. Amusing and heartening.) He said that he had some Old Testament trivial pursuit around somewhere, but couldn't find it. He teased me asking if I was sure I didn't want a creche that they had, which was, indeed, adorable. It was fun.
After that, I went to the house that had the "FREE RANGE EGGS $2/DOZ" sign outside. I drive past that house every day I take Lis to work, but had never stopped in. A friendly old woman came out to show me around, apologizing for still being in her housecoat. She's got a little studio where she does oil paintings -- seascapes and pet portraits mainly -- and a few self-published booklets on local history and the like. She showed me their poultry -- they've got a bunch of chickens, about four geese (as watchdogs, and because they're bigger than the chickens and can break the water on the water trough when it freezes over in the winter, so the chickens can also get water), a couple of ducks, just to have ducks, and a peacock. I asked, they're not selling the geese for eating -- they're just there to protect against predators and as pets. The geese did lay some eggs which hatched, but the goslings were deformed and didn't survive.
Pity: if they actually were selling poultry for eating, I'd learn shocheting, and do kosher slaughter of free-range, organically-raised, locally-raised birds.
Really nice woman, and I bought a dozen eggs, of which I've now eaten two, and they were wonderful.
Drove Lis to work. On the way, passed a sign in someone's yard saying "MOVING -- TAKE WHAT YOU WANT."
Stopped back at the yard giveaway after dropping Lis off. They're just moving down the street, but are using it as a chance to clean out some of their unused junk. I got a small bag of trinkets that will be good Student Bribes for Good Behavior -- we've been choosing one student each week who behaves the best, and giving them a reward. Things like a superball, a small packet of crayons, stuff like that. Some things are pretty cool: when my cousin
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
After that, I went to the house that had the "FREE RANGE EGGS $2/DOZ" sign outside. I drive past that house every day I take Lis to work, but had never stopped in. A friendly old woman came out to show me around, apologizing for still being in her housecoat. She's got a little studio where she does oil paintings -- seascapes and pet portraits mainly -- and a few self-published booklets on local history and the like. She showed me their poultry -- they've got a bunch of chickens, about four geese (as watchdogs, and because they're bigger than the chickens and can break the water on the water trough when it freezes over in the winter, so the chickens can also get water), a couple of ducks, just to have ducks, and a peacock. I asked, they're not selling the geese for eating -- they're just there to protect against predators and as pets. The geese did lay some eggs which hatched, but the goslings were deformed and didn't survive.
Pity: if they actually were selling poultry for eating, I'd learn shocheting, and do kosher slaughter of free-range, organically-raised, locally-raised birds.
Really nice woman, and I bought a dozen eggs, of which I've now eaten two, and they were wonderful.
Just because us neurotypicals are better at this social stuff doesn't actually mean that we're any good at it.
Seriously. I mean, a lot of you folks, having worked on trying to figure out what is socially-appropriate, how to tell what people are feeling, and whether to take some one literally or figuratively, may find yourself in the uncomfortable position of being among a group in which everyone else is NT, and you're actually better than they are at all this stuff.
Just something I was thinking about after seeing various experiences and thoughts that different autistim-spectrum folks on my friends-list were talking about.
Seriously. I mean, a lot of you folks, having worked on trying to figure out what is socially-appropriate, how to tell what people are feeling, and whether to take some one literally or figuratively, may find yourself in the uncomfortable position of being among a group in which everyone else is NT, and you're actually better than they are at all this stuff.
Just something I was thinking about after seeing various experiences and thoughts that different autistim-spectrum folks on my friends-list were talking about.
So, Lis and I were in our driveway. . .
Oct. 10th, 2005 05:58 pmWe just got out of the car, after I drove Lis home from work. We started walking up the driveway, when suddenly, every pigeon that lives on the roof of the house next door suddenly took off and flew away, making a great and startling flapping noise.
"That's weird," I thought. "The only times I've seen pigeons do that was when there was a . . . "
And then I saw a REALLY BIG pigeon land on a branch right above us, maybe eight feet straight up. 'Cept it wasn't a really big pigeon.
"Is that a . . . " I asked Lis.
"Yup," she said.
The red-tailed hawk flew off.
"Which way did it go?" I asked Lis.
"Over there."
So we ran over there to see if we could still see the hawk, thinking, "Go raptor! Go raptor! Eat pigeons! Go carnivore!"
We like hawks.
"That's weird," I thought. "The only times I've seen pigeons do that was when there was a . . . "
And then I saw a REALLY BIG pigeon land on a branch right above us, maybe eight feet straight up. 'Cept it wasn't a really big pigeon.
"Is that a . . . " I asked Lis.
"Yup," she said.
The red-tailed hawk flew off.
"Which way did it go?" I asked Lis.
"Over there."
So we ran over there to see if we could still see the hawk, thinking, "Go raptor! Go raptor! Eat pigeons! Go carnivore!"
We like hawks.
One of the breeds of rabbits they had was the hotot. The Hotot is a breed of dwarf rabbit which is all white except for a band of black around the eyes. It seriously looks like a white rabbit wearing eyeliner. I've been trying to find a really good picture to show y'all, but none of the bunnies I can find on a Google Image search are quite as adorable as the ones we saw. But do a Google image search on "hotot", and you'll get the idea.
We got up to the cage, and I looked at it, and I said, "Oh, wow. It's a goth bunny."
Lis said, "Ooo! I want one! We'll put a little bowler on it and name him Alex!"
We got up to the cage, and I looked at it, and I said, "Oh, wow. It's a goth bunny."
Lis said, "Ooo! I want one! We'll put a little bowler on it and name him Alex!"
County Fair!
Oct. 5th, 2005 09:23 pmAt some point, I'm going to catch you all up on the various stuff I've been doing in my life over the past, oh, month or so, but I'll just tell you this for now:
After going to second-day Rosh Hashana services today, Lis and I went out to the Topsfield Fair, which is, very simply, a good old fashioned county fair -- I believe it's the oldest annually-running county fair in the country.
Rides, carny games, really bad-for-you food, maple sugar cotton candy (which was just as much fun as regular cotton candy, but actually had FLAVOR, too, making it even better), apple cider donuts, racing pigs, bull riding demonstrations, raptors, an agricultural-product-detecting beagle who works for Customs at Logan airport, llamas, sheep, cattle, flowers, a 1314.8 pound pumpkin (the largest in New England -- it was seriously a pumpkin the size of a Volkswagen -- Cinderella could easily have ridden inside), Clydesdales, a rabbit and guinea pig barn, a poultry barn.
I like the Topsfield fair.
Anyway, the poultry barn was awesome. Tons of prizewinning chickens (of several breeds), ducks (of several breeds), geese, turkeys, pigeons, a few brightly-colored pheasants.
On the way out, I was looking at the "best of show" goose. First off, I was rather disturbed to notice that the sucker had fricken' TEETH. I mean, its beak was serrated -- it had TEETH. Looked scary. I mean, it looks exactly like a feathered dinosaur, but meaner. Lis keeps yelling at me when I say, "You remember -- that goose had TEETH!" because she's trying to block out the traumatic memory.
Anyway, as we were walking out past the "best of show" birds, I heard a small boy walk up behind me.
He said: "Wooah! That's a big chicken!"
After going to second-day Rosh Hashana services today, Lis and I went out to the Topsfield Fair, which is, very simply, a good old fashioned county fair -- I believe it's the oldest annually-running county fair in the country.
Rides, carny games, really bad-for-you food, maple sugar cotton candy (which was just as much fun as regular cotton candy, but actually had FLAVOR, too, making it even better), apple cider donuts, racing pigs, bull riding demonstrations, raptors, an agricultural-product-detecting beagle who works for Customs at Logan airport, llamas, sheep, cattle, flowers, a 1314.8 pound pumpkin (the largest in New England -- it was seriously a pumpkin the size of a Volkswagen -- Cinderella could easily have ridden inside), Clydesdales, a rabbit and guinea pig barn, a poultry barn.
I like the Topsfield fair.
Anyway, the poultry barn was awesome. Tons of prizewinning chickens (of several breeds), ducks (of several breeds), geese, turkeys, pigeons, a few brightly-colored pheasants.
On the way out, I was looking at the "best of show" goose. First off, I was rather disturbed to notice that the sucker had fricken' TEETH. I mean, its beak was serrated -- it had TEETH. Looked scary. I mean, it looks exactly like a feathered dinosaur, but meaner. Lis keeps yelling at me when I say, "You remember -- that goose had TEETH!" because she's trying to block out the traumatic memory.
Anyway, as we were walking out past the "best of show" birds, I heard a small boy walk up behind me.
He said: "Wooah! That's a big chicken!"
Okay. That has got to be the best subject header I've ever put on a LJ post. Pity the body isn't going to quite live up to it.
( Read more... )
( Read more... )
So, late at night when the Midnight Creepiness was keeping me awake in my bed, as it sometimes does, I started thinking about "Intelligent Design".
Now, as most of you are aware, one of the really strong arguments against the idea that some "intelligence" of some sort set out to "design" people is that, well, people are really stupidly designed.
But then it struck me.
What if we're not the point? What if the reason that we can choke, have blind spots, have crappy knees and so forth, is that we're SUPPOSED to be disposable? What if the whole purpose of humanity is to break up the surface of the world, and then cause global warming to cause great, warm, shallow seas to cover large swaths of the world, so that the creature that the "Intelligent Designer" ACTUALLY designed can take over?
You know, the one with eyes WITHOUT blind spots, because they're outgrowths of the skin, instead of the optic nerve? The one that can't choke, because it has gills? Has no joint problems because it has no joints?
Now, the only reason why octopuses HAVEN'T developed actual sapience, I think, is because of their 1) darn short lifespans and 2) dying after breeding. But if an octopus developed that actually stayed ALIVE after breeding, and then actually RAISED its offspring, well, THAT would be a creature an intelligent Intelligent Designer could be proud of designing.
And what if that's actually what is going to happen? What if that Intelligent Designer, an octopod creature, is sleeping RIGHT NOW under the sea, influencing the dreams of mankind to help us destroy ourselves and create the world for Its children?
Ia, Ia, Cthulhu fthagan!
Now, as most of you are aware, one of the really strong arguments against the idea that some "intelligence" of some sort set out to "design" people is that, well, people are really stupidly designed.
But then it struck me.
What if we're not the point? What if the reason that we can choke, have blind spots, have crappy knees and so forth, is that we're SUPPOSED to be disposable? What if the whole purpose of humanity is to break up the surface of the world, and then cause global warming to cause great, warm, shallow seas to cover large swaths of the world, so that the creature that the "Intelligent Designer" ACTUALLY designed can take over?
You know, the one with eyes WITHOUT blind spots, because they're outgrowths of the skin, instead of the optic nerve? The one that can't choke, because it has gills? Has no joint problems because it has no joints?
Now, the only reason why octopuses HAVEN'T developed actual sapience, I think, is because of their 1) darn short lifespans and 2) dying after breeding. But if an octopus developed that actually stayed ALIVE after breeding, and then actually RAISED its offspring, well, THAT would be a creature an intelligent Intelligent Designer could be proud of designing.
And what if that's actually what is going to happen? What if that Intelligent Designer, an octopod creature, is sleeping RIGHT NOW under the sea, influencing the dreams of mankind to help us destroy ourselves and create the world for Its children?
Ia, Ia, Cthulhu fthagan!
A tiger moth.
Sep. 2nd, 2005 03:43 pmMaybe a five-inch wingspan. Gorgeous moth. Banging against one of our windows battering itself trying to get out.
I caught it, showed it to the cat to see if she wanted to eat it, then, when she responded too slowly, put it out the kitchen window. It flew away, glittering.
It's a very, very small life I saved. No mind to speak of. But it's alive.
I caught it, showed it to the cat to see if she wanted to eat it, then, when she responded too slowly, put it out the kitchen window. It flew away, glittering.
It's a very, very small life I saved. No mind to speak of. But it's alive.
Here's a random trivia question for you:
Aug. 17th, 2005 04:54 pmWhat is the highest military rank achieved by a penguin?
Regimental Sergeant Major Nils Olav II, a king penguin, was recently promoted to Colonel in Chief of the Royal Norwegian Guard, an elite unit of Norway's army..
No news about his new duties, but I personally suspect that, if anyone is going to need arctic amphibious assault troops, Norway is going to be the country to watch.
Regimental Sergeant Major Nils Olav II, a king penguin, was recently promoted to Colonel in Chief of the Royal Norwegian Guard, an elite unit of Norway's army..
No news about his new duties, but I personally suspect that, if anyone is going to need arctic amphibious assault troops, Norway is going to be the country to watch.
Doomsday diseases
Jul. 27th, 2005 10:09 pmOf all the doomsday disease scenarios I've read about -- ebola mutating to be infectious in the incubatory stage, airborne AIDS -- the one I'd never seen was zombie mutation malaria.
I certainly hope that there are massive inaccuracies in this report. And that something entirely not that is actually happening. Malaria is bad, bad stuff. Malaria which is fatal in two days is nightmarish. Malaria which is fatal in two days and then brings the victims back as zombies is just. . . I lack adjectives to describe what it is, because I lack CONCEPTS to describe what it is. But "bad" is probably part of it.
At one point, I'd wanted to run a GURPS campaign based on news headlines. Just find the weirdest headlines I could find, and use those for plots. There would be some sort of great Illuminati-type black magic conspiracy behind them.
jehanna,
copperpoint, and
vonbeck all made characters for it. We played like one session.
But every time I see news articles like this one, I kind of regret that I'm not running this game.
I even remember the news story that made me want to do this campaign. As a matter of fact, a couple years later, when I took an Intro to Journalism class at Northeastern, the instructor used that story as the example of the best lede (opening sentence) of any news story he'd read.
The AP article starts out, "BOSTON (AP) -- An insurance executive was charged with tearing out his wife's
heart and lungs and impaling them on a stake in a fight about overcooked ziti."
The instructor's point was that, if the story is dramatic enough, you don't actually need to work too hard to write the lede. It pretty much writes itself.
(That particular story only gets weirder the more you look into it. Apparently, Richard Rosenthal claimed that he killed his wife because she was really an alien vampire. And he was arrested because, after killing his wife, he followed another couple home and started talking to them about gun control, because their license plate was 357-BAN.)
Anyway. My point is, it must be tough being a writer. And the world is very scary. And ZOMBIE FRICKIN' MALARIA.
I certainly hope that there are massive inaccuracies in this report. And that something entirely not that is actually happening. Malaria is bad, bad stuff. Malaria which is fatal in two days is nightmarish. Malaria which is fatal in two days and then brings the victims back as zombies is just. . . I lack adjectives to describe what it is, because I lack CONCEPTS to describe what it is. But "bad" is probably part of it.
At one point, I'd wanted to run a GURPS campaign based on news headlines. Just find the weirdest headlines I could find, and use those for plots. There would be some sort of great Illuminati-type black magic conspiracy behind them.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
But every time I see news articles like this one, I kind of regret that I'm not running this game.
I even remember the news story that made me want to do this campaign. As a matter of fact, a couple years later, when I took an Intro to Journalism class at Northeastern, the instructor used that story as the example of the best lede (opening sentence) of any news story he'd read.
The AP article starts out, "BOSTON (AP) -- An insurance executive was charged with tearing out his wife's
heart and lungs and impaling them on a stake in a fight about overcooked ziti."
The instructor's point was that, if the story is dramatic enough, you don't actually need to work too hard to write the lede. It pretty much writes itself.
(That particular story only gets weirder the more you look into it. Apparently, Richard Rosenthal claimed that he killed his wife because she was really an alien vampire. And he was arrested because, after killing his wife, he followed another couple home and started talking to them about gun control, because their license plate was 357-BAN.)
Anyway. My point is, it must be tough being a writer. And the world is very scary. And ZOMBIE FRICKIN' MALARIA.
. . . I think I'd have to go with corn/maize and bananas.
Maize and bananas are both plants whose cultivatable, food-producing forms are very different from the closest wild relatives. In both cases, the ancestral cultivatable forms are also very different from the modern plant: the earliest cultivated forms or maize produced ears that were smaller than what we have today as "baby corn", and the earliest cultivated bananas were less than two inches long. But, even so, those forms are closer to the modern plants than to the closest wild plants.
Their genetic codes show evidence of massive tampering, of course. I mean, corn has a genetic sequence orders of magnitude more complex than that of human beings, for instance. And that's got to be a result of massive crossbreeding over thousands of years. Even so, the amount of crossbreeding that would have had to be done to get the earliest wild plants into forms that were worth crossbreeding boggles the mind. Who would have spend dozens, maybe hundreds, of years, crossbreeding plants into a form that would eventually become an amazingly useful crop? And a similar argument can be made for bananas and plantains. Clearly, it must have been the work of time-traveling genetic engineer botanists. Or aliens. Or possibly the Easter bunny.
But probably time travelers.
Maize and bananas are both plants whose cultivatable, food-producing forms are very different from the closest wild relatives. In both cases, the ancestral cultivatable forms are also very different from the modern plant: the earliest cultivated forms or maize produced ears that were smaller than what we have today as "baby corn", and the earliest cultivated bananas were less than two inches long. But, even so, those forms are closer to the modern plants than to the closest wild plants.
Their genetic codes show evidence of massive tampering, of course. I mean, corn has a genetic sequence orders of magnitude more complex than that of human beings, for instance. And that's got to be a result of massive crossbreeding over thousands of years. Even so, the amount of crossbreeding that would have had to be done to get the earliest wild plants into forms that were worth crossbreeding boggles the mind. Who would have spend dozens, maybe hundreds, of years, crossbreeding plants into a form that would eventually become an amazingly useful crop? And a similar argument can be made for bananas and plantains. Clearly, it must have been the work of time-traveling genetic engineer botanists. Or aliens. Or possibly the Easter bunny.
But probably time travelers.
Historical assassinations
Jul. 4th, 2005 11:06 amSomeone on my friends list just mentioned Dr. Charles Leale, the physician who was in the Ford Theater the night President Abraham Lincoln was shot. And it got me wondering, as I did some googling on the fellow, and read about the care he administered: which historical assassinations would have been survivable given the state of medicine that we have today?
Some are obvious: President James Garfield would have survived if he'd gotten NO medical care, and was killed by doctors who hadn't heard of washing their hands. I mean, Galen could have cured Garfield. Heck, if they'd taken him home, put him to bed, bandaged him up, and done nothing else, he probably would have made it.
On the other hand, I think President John F. Kennedy is pretty much a foregone conclusion, too. I don't think any medical care in the world today could save someone who had the back of their head blown off.
But what of President Lincoln? Reading the one article I read, I'm inclined to suspect that Dr. Leale did pretty close to everything a modern doctor could have done that might have made a difference: the bullet entered just behind the left ear. Maybe a top-notch neurosurgeon (the kind that does work at Walter Reed and would have worked on the President) could have done something, but it's hard to say -- head wounds are funny that way. Dr. Leale was a surgeon with the Union Army, and had extensive experience with bullet wounds, was with the President like within a minute of his being shot, got the President breathing on his own, but felt that the brain damage was mortal. He was with the President for nine hours, when Lincoln finally died.
I feel certain that modern medicine could have kept Lincoln "alive" for over nine hours -- but whether that would have made any ultimate difference depends on the nature of the head wound.
Some are obvious: President James Garfield would have survived if he'd gotten NO medical care, and was killed by doctors who hadn't heard of washing their hands. I mean, Galen could have cured Garfield. Heck, if they'd taken him home, put him to bed, bandaged him up, and done nothing else, he probably would have made it.
On the other hand, I think President John F. Kennedy is pretty much a foregone conclusion, too. I don't think any medical care in the world today could save someone who had the back of their head blown off.
But what of President Lincoln? Reading the one article I read, I'm inclined to suspect that Dr. Leale did pretty close to everything a modern doctor could have done that might have made a difference: the bullet entered just behind the left ear. Maybe a top-notch neurosurgeon (the kind that does work at Walter Reed and would have worked on the President) could have done something, but it's hard to say -- head wounds are funny that way. Dr. Leale was a surgeon with the Union Army, and had extensive experience with bullet wounds, was with the President like within a minute of his being shot, got the President breathing on his own, but felt that the brain damage was mortal. He was with the President for nine hours, when Lincoln finally died.
I feel certain that modern medicine could have kept Lincoln "alive" for over nine hours -- but whether that would have made any ultimate difference depends on the nature of the head wound.
Plants. Plants filter and clean the air. And someone's published lists of houseplants that are particularly good at filtering out formaldehyde, benzine, and trichloroethylene, which are, apparently, the indoor pollutants most common, and most likely to cause the things which have been making me wobbly.
There are also lists of plants which are toxic to cats.
I cross-referenced them.
Here is the complete list of plants which filter out toxins and are not themselves toxic to cats:
-Spider plant
-Bamboo Palm
-Gerbera Daisy
I begin to wonder if the reason that many of the plants which are toxic to cats ARE toxic to cats is that they encapsulate and hold large amounts of formaldehyde, benzine, or trichloroethylene.
Fortunately, spider plants are really easy to care for, and bamboo palms are nice-looking, but gerbera daisies don't do much for me, are somewhat trickier to care for than I was hoping for, and are the more important ones since they deal with benzine and trichloroethylene, while spider plants and bamboo palms are mainly good for formaldehyde.
So, when we get back into the house, it's off to the greenhouse for us, I suppose. See if that helps things.
There are also lists of plants which are toxic to cats.
I cross-referenced them.
Here is the complete list of plants which filter out toxins and are not themselves toxic to cats:
-Spider plant
-Bamboo Palm
-Gerbera Daisy
I begin to wonder if the reason that many of the plants which are toxic to cats ARE toxic to cats is that they encapsulate and hold large amounts of formaldehyde, benzine, or trichloroethylene.
Fortunately, spider plants are really easy to care for, and bamboo palms are nice-looking, but gerbera daisies don't do much for me, are somewhat trickier to care for than I was hoping for, and are the more important ones since they deal with benzine and trichloroethylene, while spider plants and bamboo palms are mainly good for formaldehyde.
So, when we get back into the house, it's off to the greenhouse for us, I suppose. See if that helps things.
Researchers are CLAIMING that this is merely a way for them to maintain camoflauge as, respectively, a floating coconut and a clump of algae, while still managing to sidle away from predators.
But see, what I percieve is that this leaves six limbs free for tool use. . .
And I, for one, WELCOME our new octopod overlords.
But see, what I percieve is that this leaves six limbs free for tool use. . .
And I, for one, WELCOME our new octopod overlords.
Well, by the definition, "'today' increments when I sleep", it was today.
Alex is an African Gray parrot. He can apparently generalize concepts, and understand how language relates to abstractions and generalizations. When he is given tests about how well he understands these concepts, he scores an 85% success rate.
The interesting part is the 15% that are marked wrong.
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
"Want nut."
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
"Want nut. Want pasta."
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
Alex turns his back on the researcher and shits.
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
Alex walks over and picks up and carries over every single object on the tray EXCEPT the red metal key and places them in front of the researcher.
(mark that response wrong)
Yeah. He didn't give the response that would count as being marked "right", but it's hard to argue that he doesn't understand what's going on . . .
He's not the only parrot in the lab, although he's the oldest and has been there the longest. He and the second-longest-tenured parrot will correct the pronounciation of English words of all the other parrots.
Alex makes up new words. He likes bananas and cherries. He was given an apple once, and apparently decided he liked it, because he asked the researchers for another "banary."
Other African grays show similar levels of intelligence. One parrot, who was typically only given orange juice in the morning, asked at dinner time for "breakfast-water."
Another African gray parrot owner was watching a documentary about Alex, with her parrot, Macguyver. Macguyver turned to her and said, "Poopy on Alex. Macguyver is a good bird."
Cockatoos are not at all as skilled at mimicing human speech as parrots are, and are probably not as intelligent. Nonetheless, there are flocks of wild cockatoos that have taken to sitting around outside cafes in Australia, waiting for there to be a good number of customers sitting around, and then mimicing various cell phone rings, just to watch all the humans go diving for their bags and digging through them. These are WILD cockatoos, mind you.
Alex is an African Gray parrot. He can apparently generalize concepts, and understand how language relates to abstractions and generalizations. When he is given tests about how well he understands these concepts, he scores an 85% success rate.
The interesting part is the 15% that are marked wrong.
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
"Want nut."
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
"Want nut. Want pasta."
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
Alex turns his back on the researcher and shits.
(mark that response wrong.)
"Alex, give me the red metal key."
Alex walks over and picks up and carries over every single object on the tray EXCEPT the red metal key and places them in front of the researcher.
(mark that response wrong)
Yeah. He didn't give the response that would count as being marked "right", but it's hard to argue that he doesn't understand what's going on . . .
He's not the only parrot in the lab, although he's the oldest and has been there the longest. He and the second-longest-tenured parrot will correct the pronounciation of English words of all the other parrots.
Alex makes up new words. He likes bananas and cherries. He was given an apple once, and apparently decided he liked it, because he asked the researchers for another "banary."
Other African grays show similar levels of intelligence. One parrot, who was typically only given orange juice in the morning, asked at dinner time for "breakfast-water."
Another African gray parrot owner was watching a documentary about Alex, with her parrot, Macguyver. Macguyver turned to her and said, "Poopy on Alex. Macguyver is a good bird."
Cockatoos are not at all as skilled at mimicing human speech as parrots are, and are probably not as intelligent. Nonetheless, there are flocks of wild cockatoos that have taken to sitting around outside cafes in Australia, waiting for there to be a good number of customers sitting around, and then mimicing various cell phone rings, just to watch all the humans go diving for their bags and digging through them. These are WILD cockatoos, mind you.
The falacy of "one thing or the other."
Jun. 29th, 2003 03:02 amJust something that's been going through my mind: people like to put things in dichotomous categories. But nature, and reality in general, doesn't. . .
( What I mean. . . . )
( What I mean. . . . )