xiphias: (Default)
[personal profile] xiphias
I really don't want to go.

I don't like Champions, I'm not thrilled with the setting concept, I don't particularly like my character, I don't know the GM (he's new), and I just have absolutely no interest in this campaign.

I'm feeling pressured to go.

Lis keeps asking me why I'm not comfortable just saying I'm not going, since this is supposed to be something fun, something I enjoy.

I really don't want to go. I really don't feel comfortable telling people that. The best I can manage is passively-agressively failling to show up.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-03-16 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
FWIW, Ian's issue appears to be that he feels he made a commitment to this gaming group, and (to his credit) he takes his commitments very seriously.

He feels that commitment won't allow him to ever drop out of the gaming group, even if the only reason to go to the gaming group is because of this commitment.

Even though (aside from himself and the hosts) the entire membership of the gaming group has turned over since he joined it, even though he's not enjoying himself, even though the commitment is implicit rather than explicitly spoken, he made a commitment and feels honorbound to continue going to this weekly gaming group until the end of time.

And I'm saying that that isn't sufficient reason anymore. He's not having fun; every week he sounds like he dreads going. They've just started a new campaign, so he's not leaving any storylines hanging. I feel he should be able to say "I'm not interested in this campaign; call me before the next campaign starts and maybe I'll play in that one"

I think we both understand the logic of other's POVs, but have trouble with the emotion behind them. Anybody care to try explaining the situation more clearly to him or to me?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-03-16 11:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] griffen.livejournal.com
*tries to think of how to explain it to Ian, because he's much more on the opposite side of the fence*

Okay, hm. Do rituals still mean something once the reason for the ritual has disappeared? In the same vein, do committments still bind once the reason for the committment doesn't exist anymore?

Commitments are not set in stone, and if you're not enjoying yourself the other members of the group will pick up on it. Why do something that you're not going to enjoy and that they're not going to enjoy you not enjoying, if that makes sense.

Do you feel like you might need outside permission to say "I'm not doing this," or another reason besides the main truth of why you don't want to do it?

Help me unpack this a bit, if you can. My sympathies in any case.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-03-16 11:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
Okay, hm. Do rituals still mean something once the reason for the ritual has disappeared?

Absoluely. My entire religion is based largely on that notion.

In the same vein, do committments still bind once the reason for the committment doesn't exist anymore?

Yes.

And commitments are set in stone. That's why they're called "commitments". If they weren't set in stone, they wouldn't be commitments.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-03-16 11:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] griffen.livejournal.com

Okay, hm. Do rituals still mean something once the reason for the ritual has disappeared?
Absoluely. My entire religion is based largely on that notion.

In the same vein, do committments still bind once the reason for the committment doesn't exist anymore?
Yes.


Okay. Since I don't wish to poke at that, because it's a religious difference in both the specific and the general sense, let me try another tack.

And commitments are set in stone. That's why they're called "commitments". If they weren't set in stone, they wouldn't be commitments.

All right... are committments subject to renegotiation?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-03-16 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
A couple questions on commitment:
  • Under what circumstances is it acceptable to renegotiate a commitment? If you don't feel you can unilaterally dismiss a commitment, is it acceptable to talk with the other party about modifying the terms or even negotiating an end?
  • What are your rules when multiple commitments conflict? I'm not just talking about when you've had family obligations scheduled against your gaming (which you've handled on a case-by-case basis) but if multiple people are acting on conflicting commitments?
  • What if nothing is left of the commitment but expectations? Can you find some other way of meeting those social obligations outside of game?

In some respect, this feels to me like you're putting everybody else's wants above your own, and setting your own needs last.
  • Is it possible for you to make a commitment towards your own mental wellbeing that can be considered alongside your other commitments?

    BTW, I love you very much, and thank you for posting about this.
  • (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 12:04 pm (UTC)
    gingicat: woman in a green dress and cloak holding a rose, looking up at snow falling down on her (Default)
    From: [personal profile] gingicat
    And commitments are set in stone. That's why they're called "commitments". If they weren't set in stone, they wouldn't be commitments.

    What if someone you knew in a bad marriage tossed this out as the reason not to leave? Yes, it's an extreme example. But as Lis said, you have a commitment to your own well-being.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 12:11 pm (UTC)
    From: [personal profile] cheshyre
    But as Lis said, you have a commitment to your own well-being.

    Actually, I don't think he does have such a commitment in his belief system.
    That's why I've been asking him if he can make one.
    [Assistance on this would be greatly appreciated :) ]

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 12:17 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] teddywolf.livejournal.com
    Are you committed to go to the same shul, no matter where it was you first went to shul?
    Are you committed to go to first grade for the rest of your life?

    Commitments change with time. Some are permanent in nature but voluntary in scope, notably marriage and religion. Some have defined time limits but may be mandatory in some way, like first grade.

    Commitments are commitments because we commit ourselves to doing them, but we have reasons for committing ourselves in the first place. If those reasons change or go away then a re-evaluation of the commitment is in order.

    Quickfire quiz - your friend is dating someone great, sweet, pleasant to be around and then suddenly your friend's sweetie turns into a druggie with bad attitude who wrecks every social gathering. What do you advise your friend to do?
    1) Stay! It's a commitment through thick and thin no matter what! Don't say another word!
    2) Discuss things with the sweetie! Maybe they don't know they're being a pain but it needs to be addressed! If it can't be dealt with, *then* look at what to do!
    3) Leave suddenly! Your sweetie needs no explanation and probably won't notice anyways!

    I'm pretty sure I know your answer, Ian. Now if you substitute "sweetie" for "gaming group" would your answer change for your friend?
    And if it doesn't change for your friend, why should it be so different for you?

    I've been in the same headspace, b'ror. T'ain't fun. It kept me in a couple of bad relationships months or even years longer than I should have stayed.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 06:19 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] yehoshua.livejournal.com
    And commitments are set in stone. That's why they're called "commitments". If they weren't set in stone, they wouldn't be commitments

    As long as you're dragging yiddishkeit into this, I'd direct your attention to Nedarim 22a, and the text of kol nidrei derived therefrom. [insert halachic thumb waving here] If you made a neder with a group (unlikely), and if you find for whatever reason that you cannot in good faith uphold your end of that neder, you can, nay, must, seek release from the vow by the other party/parties. If you think you made a neder but you no longer have kavanah, you're probably already violating the neder anyway, and it might be better from a halachic standpoint to make kaporos now rather than drag it out.

    But then, I'm not your rov.

    PS: if you feel you made a neder with an eidah, and the membership of that community has turned over and essentially reformed with new membership, you might want to inquire what your obligations are to the new community. CYL*R.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-17 08:22 am (UTC)
    gingicat: woman in a green dress and cloak holding a rose, looking up at snow falling down on her (Default)
    From: [personal profile] gingicat
    Kavanah was the word I was looking for with regard to Judaism, and commitment. Thanks.
    Now, to Ian, what I was thinking about yesterday afternoon:
    If you ask a rabbi whether it is better to pray with kavanah or without, they will of course say to pray with. If you ask a rabbi whether it is better to pray without kavanah or not pray at all, they'll sigh and say "Pray anyway and *strive* for kavanah." I think this was what you were aiming at when you said "My entire religion is based largely on that notion [that rituals still mean something even when the reason has disappeared]."
    But you see, that's the purpose of kavanah; to give meaning to something that seems meaningless. That's why you and all the other *good* Hebrew school teachers out there teach the reasons, not just the rituals. That's why the Passover Seder includes questions and answers; to bring meaning.
    Now then, back to this gaming thing. If you can't even give enough kavanah to go there and try, then you're really not doing them any favors. Papersky and Vonbeck have already pointed out that being honest about your feelings observes the spirit of the commitment more than breaking the short-term promise to go to the session.
    *hugs* Hope this helps.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 11:18 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com
    If I were the GM, I'd much rather you called to say you wouldn't be there.

    I have been in games where I felt like that, and I was always so glad to stop when I eventually managed it... how many people have they got?

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 11:28 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] teddywolf.livejournal.com
    IMO, a gaming group has a certain amount of give and take. You are expected to give your time and some of your sense of fun and creativity. In return you should have a reasonable expectation of fun when you go to play.

    I run Game Night because it's fun. As soon as it is no longer regularly fun I will stop hosting it. Games *are* for fun, that's a big part of playing them.

    I would love to be in a regular gaming group for an RPG because I am quite sure I'd have fun playing. That said, last time I went to a run with a new group was a couple of years ago. They ran later than I could handle and there was a bit too much smoke in the air. Also I wasn't having fun at the time - so I emailed the GM and let him know that the group wasn't a match for me and the reasons why.

    IMO I'd suggest telling them that you'll be giving the current campaign a miss. You aren't having fun with it, you don't know the GM, you don't like the setting, you don't like your character... going just because the people playing with you expect you to is not healthy for you. What's more, it may have an impact on how much you want to game overall and may also bring into question how much you *really* like going to gaming things. I would not want you coming to Games Night just for obligation - I want you coming because you're having fun and enjoying yourself and enjoying playing. And the weeks you've felt too blah to come you've stayed home. Yeah, I've missed you - I like playing with you. But I respect your space and need for it. I suspect the other players in your gaming group would do the same.

    Asking for a hiatus isn't disrespecting the group. It's respecting the fundamental value of the group - that you come for fun.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 05:01 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] copperpoint.livejournal.com
    Gaming when you're not up for it is not only going to make you unhappy, it's going to detract from the enjoyment of people who really are into it. If it was just a "well this time I'm not up for it but normally I am" sort of deal, I could see the point in toughing it out through one or two sessions where you werent really into it, but you're only taking away from everyones good time if every time you show up you're obviously not into it.

    (no subject)

    Date: 2003-03-16 05:59 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] yehoshua.livejournal.com
    I don't like Champions, I'm not thrilled with the setting concept, I don't particularly like my character, I don't know the GM (he's new), and I just have absolutely no interest in this campaign.

    Sounds like a bad case of "Okay okay, I'll be the #&@!ing thief already-itis" has set in. You say you made a commitment, but either the circumstances of the gaming have changed significantly or the commitment made was an ill-considered one. Either way, if you're just making yourself miserable, it's not likely to be good for anyone there.

    Put another way, I put a lot of time and effort into a game for about five years, including R&D on a campaign setting I was in the process of pitching to one of the major RPG companies. But at some point in the testplay, I lost control of it and it morphed into something hatefully stupid and emotionally damaging (and not because of the suits). I walked away from a half dozen friends and about $8k in stranded costs to get out of the situation because it was rotting my soul. You're a much more civilised and sociable sort than I. You can do it without the lost friends and the lost $$$ if you want.

    Comment from another menber of the gaming group

    Date: 2003-03-17 07:13 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] vonbeck.livejournal.com
    I personally don't have problem with you sitting this run out.
    I will miss having you at game (not only are you a good friend,
    but IMO one of eth better gamers in the group.)

    I am a bit miffed at your saying you will be playing, then not
    showing up. We have just lost another player (for at least this
    run0 and are getting kind of short on players. The group needs
    to decide if bringing in another player or two should be done.

    I think it would show more of a comitment to the group to inform
    them that you did not want to attend the current run, instead of
    simply not showing up.

    I'm sitting out too at present....

    Date: 2003-03-17 01:09 pm (UTC)
    From: (Anonymous)
    As one of the other members of the group who is currently sitting out for a break and the original group organizer (long personal story ommitted) and has been for a month now, I think you're doing the wrong thing by simply not letting the GM or the Organizer know that you need some time out, so that they can find someone to take your slot who wants to be in the current game.


    Not being thrilled with the system or the setting should be valid reasons to aske to be excused from the current game. So too is having too many things on your plate taking up your time and effort, or just not feeling up to a game because of extreme stress or ill health.


    (The group has not had a complete turn over since it started as someone stated by the way.... just about 50%... which is not bad for a group thats been running for 5+ years. It has picked up others along the way, some of whom didn't last and others who left after a year or two due to other life commitments, moves out of state or country, etc.).


    Tell folks you need a break Ian, and take it. They will understand this far better than randomly showing up every few weeks when you can't find an excuse not to show and just being depressed and withdrawn when you do come.


    Joe

    A Message From the Host

    Date: 2003-03-17 06:53 pm (UTC)
    From: (Anonymous)
    Hello, I'm Kiralee, the current host of the gaming group in question. I have a question for Ian, if it's not too much of a bother. Did you enjoy the most recent Ironclaw run? --------- Personally, I'd hoped you would take part in this campaign, but I wasn't expecting you to. I tried not to say anything about my hopes, because I didn't want to put you in exactly this position. I'm a little disappointed that I failed. For the record: Ian, you are welcome to take part in any or all of the gaming activities of the Western Ave. Irregulars. Ian, you are welcome to NOT take part in any or all of the gaming activities of the Western Ave. Irregulars. Ian, if you wish, you may take part in some of the activities and campaigns, and not in others. I'd prefer to know ahead of time what you're doing, but I can handle things on the fly if you need/want me to. If it gets to the point where I can't handle things, I will tell you. ------------- Regarding commitments... some of the promises involved, at least on my side, are a little more serious than what's normal in a gaming group. I'd like to see these commitments renegotiated, if that's possible. As things stand, I don't think they are doing anyone any good. Unfortunately, I think it will take time, patience, skill, and effort to do this. More than an hour or two, or even four. I'm willing to put in that effort if you are. Kiralee

    November 2018

    S M T W T F S
         123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930 

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags