![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Does SYG effectively decriminalize dueling? With no Duty to Retreat, you've got no duty to avoid deadly conflicts. Therefore, you can deliberately seek out deadly conflicts, so long as your opponent is reasonably armed. Therefore, arranged duels. If the loser presented a reasonable threat, the survivor can claim self-defense, and, as SYG largely removes the police's ability to investigate, who's to say otherwise?
Posted via LiveJournal app for Android.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 04:03 pm (UTC)So SYG only legalizes dueling if there are no witnesses and all duels are to the death, because that way the winner can claim self-defense.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 04:23 pm (UTC)...I'd think the premeditation would take it out of SYG-territory, myself. If you intend to have a duel, and ostensibly your intent beforehand is to kill the other person (i.e. presuming you are not suicidal), then any attempt to argue self-defense would be pretty weak.
But at least it'll make some lawyers very rich.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 05:01 pm (UTC). . . I honestly think that a lot of the law enforcement officers in SYG states would be fine with taking Matt Dillon as a law enforcement model. I honestly think that, in some cases, that might even be an improvement . . .
(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 05:10 pm (UTC)The more interesting application for the SYG laws, I think, is possibly as a go-around that would decriminalize various abortion procedures.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-05-03 09:01 pm (UTC)