xiphias: (Default)
[personal profile] xiphias
44 SQ, 70 EQ. Gives me a "female brain".

Given that NOBODY I've seen so far has scored anywhere close to the mean on either of these, I suspect these tests are, to put it gently, bullshit.

*waves*

Date: 2003-04-19 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vuurvasthouden.livejournal.com

Yes, they are. Stick around me and you'll see many quizzes that are -- politely -- bullshit *cough*puritytest*cough*.

I can't recall what he scored on that test SQ/EQ Test....

Re: *waves*

Date: 2003-04-19 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vuurvasthouden.livejournal.com

Bleh! That "he" in the last sentence should read "I".

<_<

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelovernh.livejournal.com
I wish I had a clue what you were talking about.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 07:30 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
See here -- it's a new supposedly scientific test showing the brain difference between men and women.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supergee.livejournal.com
That test is obviously crap, but I still have faith in "What Sex Toy Are You?" (I am the hi-tech sex toy of the future.)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 06:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bikergeek.livejournal.com
I've got a rant about how Asperger's is going to be the ADHD of the aughts--overdiagnosed, applied to normal variations in adult and child behavior, and used to pathologize otherwise normal children.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkmattr.livejournal.com
And on a completly unrelated note...


Added you, I need more Jewgeeks in my life, loved the post in weirdjews.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmjwell.livejournal.com
Go girlfriend!

You know, you are just sooooo kyute when you get all indignant like that!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-19 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] noveldevice.livejournal.com
Definitely bullshit. Since I scored 61 on the EQ and an apparently unprecedented FIFTY-NINE on the SQ. His little blurb says that women never score that high. Well, golly. I'm definitely a woman.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-21 07:57 am (UTC)
goljerp: Photo of the moon Callisto (Io)
From: [personal profile] goljerp
I dunno, I think that some explicit photos would be in order. Of course, although I scored 46 on the EQ and 31 on SQ, this comment alone should prove that I'm a man. (Or a lesbian.)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-22 08:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] noveldevice.livejournal.com
Hmph. How about a photo of my feminine, shapely middle finger, in an appropriate configuration? ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-22 01:11 pm (UTC)
goljerp: Photo of the moon Callisto (Io)
From: [personal profile] goljerp
Uh, no need... I can visualize it quite easily. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-04-21 08:01 am (UTC)
goljerp: Photo of the moon Callisto (Default)
From: [personal profile] goljerp
I think that any test that gives only four options is going to give false results, unless there are a whole lot of questions. I think that I probably scored higher on the second test when I realized that I might as well express violent opinions because I'd get more points that way. (If you slightly disagree with a statement that gives points for agreement, you don't get any points. Yes, I know it's not all about getting points.) If there were more options - even a "no opinion" option - then it would be a better test. (And, of course, a more complex scoring scheme that would recognize the 'no opinion' answers.)

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags