![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A guy from Security had come up for his massage on Sunday, late morning, early afternoon. After his massage, he was mentioning how calm Security had been this year. They'd had a betting pool going about "what time Saturday night the drunken rowdiness would require Security intervention."
As of noon on Sunday, nobody had collected.
We were trying to figure out why, and came up with a number of theories.
One, the elevator problems and layout things worked in our favor. You could go to a party and start drinking, but then, if you wanted to party-hop to another party with booze. . .
The party suite rooms were the ones that ended in 32. So, let's say there were big parties, with free booze, in 632, 732, and 832.
You could sort of imagine the floorplan of the hotel, looking from above, as something kind of topologically similar to a triskellion. That's not remotely what it was SHAPED like, but in terms of walking-paths, that will give you something of an idea.
The X32 rooms are at the tip of one branch, the two staircases were at the tips of the other two branches, and the elevators were somewhere vaguely close to the center point.
So, you're in 632, and you've sucked down their booze, and you're now ready to suck down someone else's booze.
So you leave your branch, and go to the center, and you wait for an elevator.
Which, of course, doesn't show up, so you get fed up and go to the stairs. So you walk down another branch, go down or up a flight, come out, go back through that branch to the center, then go out a branch to the X32 room.
That's a LOT of walking for free booze. And well worth it, but it meant that you actually had to be CAPABLE of walking that far to get more free booze.
Which is, frankly, a limiting factor.
I suggested that perhaps the membership cap was a factor.
This was not seen as likely, because, even with the membership cap, previous conventions were only 200 or 300 people larger.
"Ah, but WHICH 200 or 300 people?" And, let's face it -- our membership cap was 2000. 2200 or 2300 is 10 or 15% larger. That's not nothing.
And that does lead to another issue -- it's a smaller hotel -- there were just fewer places to put parties. A number of the perennial parties that are there year after year just weren't, for lack of space.
And of course, another reason was the layout. With an open layout to a central court, Security could really see what was going on, pretty much everywhere. You had good sightlines -- there weren't many places you could be staggering through a hallway where you'd be hard to spot.
As of noon on Sunday, nobody had collected.
We were trying to figure out why, and came up with a number of theories.
One, the elevator problems and layout things worked in our favor. You could go to a party and start drinking, but then, if you wanted to party-hop to another party with booze. . .
The party suite rooms were the ones that ended in 32. So, let's say there were big parties, with free booze, in 632, 732, and 832.
You could sort of imagine the floorplan of the hotel, looking from above, as something kind of topologically similar to a triskellion. That's not remotely what it was SHAPED like, but in terms of walking-paths, that will give you something of an idea.
The X32 rooms are at the tip of one branch, the two staircases were at the tips of the other two branches, and the elevators were somewhere vaguely close to the center point.
So, you're in 632, and you've sucked down their booze, and you're now ready to suck down someone else's booze.
So you leave your branch, and go to the center, and you wait for an elevator.
Which, of course, doesn't show up, so you get fed up and go to the stairs. So you walk down another branch, go down or up a flight, come out, go back through that branch to the center, then go out a branch to the X32 room.
That's a LOT of walking for free booze. And well worth it, but it meant that you actually had to be CAPABLE of walking that far to get more free booze.
Which is, frankly, a limiting factor.
I suggested that perhaps the membership cap was a factor.
This was not seen as likely, because, even with the membership cap, previous conventions were only 200 or 300 people larger.
"Ah, but WHICH 200 or 300 people?" And, let's face it -- our membership cap was 2000. 2200 or 2300 is 10 or 15% larger. That's not nothing.
And that does lead to another issue -- it's a smaller hotel -- there were just fewer places to put parties. A number of the perennial parties that are there year after year just weren't, for lack of space.
And of course, another reason was the layout. With an open layout to a central court, Security could really see what was going on, pretty much everywhere. You had good sightlines -- there weren't many places you could be staggering through a hallway where you'd be hard to spot.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:24 am (UTC)lets say, hypotheticly, perhaps? Hyptheticly I may have stayed in the one on the 7th floor, so I couldn't speculate about the 6th or 8th :) The open court also had the interesting effect of letting everyone see where the parties were very clearly. But the parties that were giving away booze seemed to be selective about who they let in the door. I encountered someone in the halls who was cruising for a get drunk and fall down sort of party, and she was unable to talk her way past the door guard on 7.
But speculating about the lack of disaster, I think that the membership probably had a good effect on the bad people. I would hope that the party element wouldn't be any more supressed than it was, but it is good that there weren't any disasters.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:34 am (UTC)I felt pretty good about talking my way in. My wife tells me that when I'm talking to girls I think are pretty I can get really charming.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 04:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 10:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 12:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 10:52 am (UTC)I always heard that ziggurauts would stunt your growth.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 01:49 am (UTC)Boston University has a chronic shortage of dorm rooms at the start of the fall semester and houses the overflow in nearby hotels, including the Cambridge Hyatt. Usually enough dorm space opens up by the start of the spring semester to move everyone on-campus, I wonder if these were students still living in the hotel?
I remember seeing a newspaper article (possibly in the Boston Globe) on the subject, but I can't seem to find it now. Wikipedia also mentions this, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_University_Housing_System#Hotels:_The_Hyatt_and_Holiday_Inn_Brookline.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 03:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 03:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-15 08:33 pm (UTC)Unfortunately, there were a ton of parties on the first floor I didn't know about and so I went to bed early since the x32s had pooped out. Bleah.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 01:01 am (UTC)And the hotel was great about getting non fen out of the building on Friday.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 03:14 am (UTC)It sort of makes sense: pre-regs are sold to people who can plan ahead. Those sorts tend to be more adult.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-16 04:13 am (UTC)