My sister's fiance is being reactivated.
Aug. 28th, 2006 11:39 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
He's 42. But he was in the Special Forces, so he has useful skills, and is therefore being called up.
I was just talking to Sibling, and we were commenting that, in all honesty, his brain is far more useful right now than his ability to be shot at, so we're really, really hoping that he's stationed, ideally, stateside as command-and-control, codebreaking, or training, or at least nowhere near the front lines. We thought about how we could get this message to someone, and I pointed out that at least ONE of us has to have our phones tapped.
"Yeah!" she said, "and I'm on a cell phone anyway, so they're definitely listening: his name is XXX XXX XXX, and he's stationed out of XXX XXX XXX, and he's really going to be more useful in a training or control role, so that's what you should do -- it would be a waste to put him on the front lines. Plus, he's got many years of experience as a police officer, so he can help set up that sort of thing, too. See? This is the good part of illegal wiretapping!"
He's 42, engaged to my sister, and has a teenage daughter. He's got a number of years in various police departments, and a postgraduate degree in theology. If they ask him to carry a gun and be shot at, he'll go and do that, and won't even complain about it any more than average, but I hope, for his sake, for my sister's sake, and for the country's sake, that they have a better idea in mind.
I was just talking to Sibling, and we were commenting that, in all honesty, his brain is far more useful right now than his ability to be shot at, so we're really, really hoping that he's stationed, ideally, stateside as command-and-control, codebreaking, or training, or at least nowhere near the front lines. We thought about how we could get this message to someone, and I pointed out that at least ONE of us has to have our phones tapped.
"Yeah!" she said, "and I'm on a cell phone anyway, so they're definitely listening: his name is XXX XXX XXX, and he's stationed out of XXX XXX XXX, and he's really going to be more useful in a training or control role, so that's what you should do -- it would be a waste to put him on the front lines. Plus, he's got many years of experience as a police officer, so he can help set up that sort of thing, too. See? This is the good part of illegal wiretapping!"
He's 42, engaged to my sister, and has a teenage daughter. He's got a number of years in various police departments, and a postgraduate degree in theology. If they ask him to carry a gun and be shot at, he'll go and do that, and won't even complain about it any more than average, but I hope, for his sake, for my sister's sake, and for the country's sake, that they have a better idea in mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 03:56 pm (UTC)We have a friend who has been in Iraq for over a year. Worked for a Think Tank here in the USA doing strategy stuff for the government in regards to diplomacy stuff, and in his 40s as well. Really a brains kind of guy... and an officer.
Unfortunately, his experience for the govt was in military intelligence. So, he's in the field, collecting data, dealing with the locals, and pretty much a guy with a translator, a computer and a sidearm and not much else, as are the people in his command, setting up attempts to network with the local police, sub-contractors, politicians etc.
He left his teenagers in guardianship of a couple of friends while he's been gone, and one of them took his own life a few months ago. They wouldn't give him leave or send him back to deal with it... another friend had to step in and take over the day to day household ops with his kids.
The military is being about as intelligent and sympathetic as rocks these days.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 04:42 pm (UTC)(Which is a bigger threat to marriage? Statistics say deployment divorces are common, while here in Gay Marriageland the divorce rate is... er... lower than Texas's.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:26 pm (UTC)Either way, it's dreadful, but if they wouldn't even send him back if his own kid committed suicide... Jesus.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:55 pm (UTC)I've heard other horror stories from friends, of two parent families with both parents deployed over seas in different units and either having to leave an older child more or less in charge of things with very elderly grandparents left in guardianship on paper.
The concept of hardship exceptions are pretty much non-existant. They've even dragged doctors who had been retired from practice for a decade back into service in some cases.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 04:07 pm (UTC)On a less silly note, I hope all goes well. Deployment is rough no matter how risky the assignment is.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 04:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:15 pm (UTC)Pray for him, willya?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:22 pm (UTC)I'm definetely going to be thinking of him, and his daughter, and your sister.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 05:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 06:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 06:15 pm (UTC)2. Canada. Toronto is lovely this time of year.
You think I'm kidding.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 08:10 pm (UTC)2. Kent is patriotic. He hates the war, hates the President, hates the stupidity -- but believes that, if by incompetent leadership, we ARE in a moronic war -- as long as there's an American soldier over there, and they need him, he's got a duty to be there.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:02 pm (UTC)I guess my definition of "patriotism" always has to include the possibility of civil disobedience. I can't imagine feeling patriotic about a country without also imagining choices for myself in the event of colossal stupidity on the part of the power structure. But that's probably just my fled-the-Russian-army genetics talking.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:31 pm (UTC)And he looks at his word the way you look at yours.
Okay, so I can't imagine you taking an open-ended oath of service to a country, no matter who controlled that country, although I can imagine you taking an oath to a person -- but that's what Kent did.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:57 pm (UTC)Rather better than mine, I should think. I've made too many mistakes I knew better than to make to say otherwise.
Okay, so I can't imagine you taking an open-ended oath of service to a country, no matter who controlled that country, although I can imagine you taking an oath to a person -- but that's what Kent did.
This is really the essential difference, yeah. I wouldn't take that oath.
Warriors have always been known for swearing great and terrible oaths that come back to bite them later, though, so he's in a vast tradition. I hope the forces that recognize that tradition will watch over him now.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 10:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 10:13 pm (UTC)I don't think it's a lack of mercy, although that's an argument I keep having with people who adhere to the religions of the Book. I'm not going to try to stuff everything I could write about that into a comment, so let's just say I meant it as something a bit more positive than all that.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 10:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 10:24 pm (UTC)But if it'll make you feel better, I'll refrain from prayer.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 11:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 12:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-28 09:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-29 03:23 am (UTC)Just a thought.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-30 07:32 pm (UTC)I hope so too. But this is the organization that booted an Arab-speaking soldier because he's gay (http://psu-jedi.livejournal.com/137314.html), so I wouldn't expect them to do the smart thing in this case. (But, like I said, I hope there's someone who's smart enough to realize what SHOULD be done!)