Following up to my last post:
Aug. 16th, 2006 10:11 pmSo, Samuel L. Jackson, apparently, has this thing where he goes, anonymously, to blogs and chatrooms and fora and so forth, and talks to people about how great Samuel L. Jackson is.
And I think that's awesome, and funny, and cute.
But if basically ANY other celebrity did this, I'd think it was scummy, and weird, and creepy, and dishonest.
So -- what is it about SLJ that makes it okay for him?
I mean, if Tom Cruise was doing it -- ick. Then again, that's not fair: if I heard a report stating that Tom Cruise breathes and eats food, I'd consider photosynthesis and gills. But still -- if Wil Wheaton was doing that -- how odd and creepy. If Nathan Fillion or Bruce Campbell did that -- okay, that might be funny, but only if they owned up to it pretty quickly.
Are there any other celebrities that could get away with it?
And I think that's awesome, and funny, and cute.
But if basically ANY other celebrity did this, I'd think it was scummy, and weird, and creepy, and dishonest.
So -- what is it about SLJ that makes it okay for him?
I mean, if Tom Cruise was doing it -- ick. Then again, that's not fair: if I heard a report stating that Tom Cruise breathes and eats food, I'd consider photosynthesis and gills. But still -- if Wil Wheaton was doing that -- how odd and creepy. If Nathan Fillion or Bruce Campbell did that -- okay, that might be funny, but only if they owned up to it pretty quickly.
Are there any other celebrities that could get away with it?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:22 am (UTC)Hmm...uhm...I'm not sure.
You know what would be even weirder is if the celebrity would go around chatrooms dissing his own self then arguing with his defenders. ;D
But in Tom Cruise's case if he did that, he'd end up with too much agreement and no one to argue with. >____>
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 03:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:26 am (UTC)"Vin Diesel: GM from Hell"
- come on, he'd so do it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 04:53 am (UTC)And yet, we just watched the Daily Show (via TiVo) and I found it funny that he was cheerfully talking about how he used the blogosphere to force the studio to use his bidding.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 10:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 03:39 pm (UTC)Kiralee
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-20 01:06 am (UTC)It's cool because it's silly and he's freely going with the silly.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 02:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 03:49 am (UTC)Beyond that, my guess is that a fair bit of it is simply the SLJ mystique. He presumably doesn't need to boost his own ego one bit, and so one assumes that he's not astroturfing for that purpose at all. With the ego-boost completely removed, the only reason left is because he thinks it's funny. And it's funny in a sort of "Ha! Pwned!" sort of way, which is ... well, if you actually like SLJ a fair bit, getting pwned by him personally would be something to be savored as a badge of honor rather than annoyed at. Which isn't really the case for non-badass actors until one gets to serious worrisome hero-worship states.
I think maybe it's a little like Muhammed Ali saying "I am the greatest!" Any doubt in the speakers mind about the truth of the matter makes it into a vain ego-boost, but it can be pulled off if it's said with completely pure conviction.
Or something like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 04:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 11:19 am (UTC)But if he's still doing it in 2 years, then ick.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-17 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-20 02:18 am (UTC)