We have it on DVD. But I'd never watched it. So we just did.
What an absolutley horrible movie. I mean, truly, truly disturbing.
I don't think I'd be so bothered by it if I wasn't such a fan of the book. But, c'mon. The whole message is disturbing and twisted and horrible.
On the other hand, I do now understand why "Friend of Dorothy" is a codeword for "gay." My goodness, but the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion flame. It was like watching an episode of "Oz Eye for the Kansas Guy."
What an absolutley horrible movie. I mean, truly, truly disturbing.
I don't think I'd be so bothered by it if I wasn't such a fan of the book. But, c'mon. The whole message is disturbing and twisted and horrible.
On the other hand, I do now understand why "Friend of Dorothy" is a codeword for "gay." My goodness, but the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion flame. It was like watching an episode of "Oz Eye for the Kansas Guy."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 02:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 03:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 03:30 am (UTC)"You're doin' it yourself!"
"Oh. Heh heh... I'm such a butterpaws."
Best role ever.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 05:41 am (UTC)http://www.musicals101.com/gay4.htm
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 03:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:55 am (UTC)Personally, I appreciate many elements of the MGM film a great deal, but other parts (especially the ending) bug the heck out of me.
There are actually a number of films that have some claim to be "the sequel". Are you talking about the Fairuza Balk one? I've got a love/hate relationship with that one as well...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:05 am (UTC)I too read the book first, which seems to be a significant indicator of one's opinion of the movie.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 07:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:54 am (UTC)Are you serious?
Date: 2005-01-29 03:54 pm (UTC)http://members.cox.net/stegokitty/dsotr_pages/dsotr.htm
Personally, I found it uncanny, but no one else I know agrees. They all think it's just a coincidence.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 07:31 pm (UTC)Pay attention to what you read
Date: 2005-03-04 08:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 04:56 am (UTC)(
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 05:55 pm (UTC)Or read the book. They are quite different from what I hear. (I've only read the book, not seen the show.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 12:36 pm (UTC)Mom explained that when books are made into movies, they are frequently changed. This has helped me a lot over the years with dealing with book adaptations to movies.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 03:43 pm (UTC)in
its
day...
You were SUPPOSED to watch it when you were 6!
OF COURSE the story was trite! AND the acting was overacting at best...
And Merkins wanted something upbeat.
Still... I always wanted to do the lullaby league...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 07:00 pm (UTC)"A young girl arrives in a strange country and kills the first person she meets. She then teams up with some strangers to kill again."
--Pellegrina, who usually reads and enjoys Lis's blog
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-29 07:02 pm (UTC)Oh dear, I'll just go quiver in a corner with embarrassment now.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-04 10:11 pm (UTC)Hey! Welcome!
(This would have been more effective at quelling quivering in embarrasment, had I posted it a month ago. . . )