Sep. 10th, 2012

xiphias: (Default)
Like, I assume, ALL of you who are Americans, I find it downright HUMILIATING that a LOT of my countrymen are Biblical literalists. Do any of you have to deal with Creationists and Christian Biblical literalists in your lives?
Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he hold to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion. [1 Timothy 1.7]

That's Saint Augustine back in the fifth century.
Biblical literalism and creationism was considered primitive and stupid BEFORE the Middle Ages. Not only have Biblical literalists failed to come up to the 21st Century, they've failed to come up to the FIFTH Century. They're espousing ideas that were discredited in Christianity before the fall of Rome.

That's just plain embarrassing. Less embarrassing for me, I guess, since I'm Jewish, but still.
xiphias: (Default)
Is it wrong to look at the Unataneh Tokef and think of the Gashlycrumb Tinies?

Any cartoonists out there who can do Gorey's style and make this happen somehow?

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags