(no subject)
Oct. 5th, 2004 10:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Honestly, if I was going to choose a "winner" of the VP debate, I'd probably choose Cheney.
Seriously.
The thing here, though, is, this isn't a debate. Both people get a chance to talk about stuff.
That's a good thing, frankly. I think that, in general, Edwards is doing a better job of answering questions in such a way that will shift undecided voters to his ticket. Slightly. But, the thing is, Cheney's coming across as downright likable. At least, compared to how I percieved him previously.
Not gonna change my vote, of course. I like the Kerry/Edwards ticket, I like what they stand for. But I think Cheney is coming across much better than I thought he would, and Edwards isn't quite as pulled together as I hoped.
So, I dunno. Who will this help more? Dunno. In some ways, seeing how much better Cheney is doing than Bush did, I don't think that's really all that good for the Republican ticket. . .
Seriously.
The thing here, though, is, this isn't a debate. Both people get a chance to talk about stuff.
That's a good thing, frankly. I think that, in general, Edwards is doing a better job of answering questions in such a way that will shift undecided voters to his ticket. Slightly. But, the thing is, Cheney's coming across as downright likable. At least, compared to how I percieved him previously.
Not gonna change my vote, of course. I like the Kerry/Edwards ticket, I like what they stand for. But I think Cheney is coming across much better than I thought he would, and Edwards isn't quite as pulled together as I hoped.
So, I dunno. Who will this help more? Dunno. In some ways, seeing how much better Cheney is doing than Bush did, I don't think that's really all that good for the Republican ticket. . .
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 07:32 pm (UTC)Which annoys me, but I take comfort in the fact that people base their votes on the president, not the vice president.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 07:33 pm (UTC)He's got decades of experience; he can stick to a line and make it sound plausible, even though it's a flat lie. Edwards got a little rattled, and spent too much time reciting talking points.
still, even if Cheney'd win if it were a question of him vs. Edwards, he can't prop up Bush, so it hardly matters.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 07:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 08:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 09:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-05 09:10 pm (UTC)Cheney ... I think he came off as extremely competent, and possibly likable just on account of that (and on account of coming across as showing his true self), but I really don't want him running my country, because I never got a sense that he'd do anything in my interest without being pushed into needing to.
Meanwhile, I thought his command of numbers and data was a virtuoso performance. When numbers came up, he was able to list off small handfuls of facts in a manner that made it clear they were part of a big pile of things, not just "lookit this important number I memorized".
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-06 08:05 am (UTC)liesinaccurate. Pity, I'd love to hear some real numbers from the current White House people.(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-06 04:07 am (UTC)The papers down here seem to think that both candidates were off-putting in different ways. Bit of a wash.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-06 08:42 am (UTC)Maybe we can add a Kerry-Cheney debate to the schedule. Show it on Pay-Per-View.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-06 09:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-10 11:28 am (UTC)Jillaurie