(no subject)

Date: 2013-07-09 02:27 pm (UTC)
(My footnotes didn't fit within the text limit for comments:)

[1] Of course, the field of "cognitive psychology" is itself just a category :-)

[2] I have witnessed many pointless arguments that spring from the false beliefs that categories are binary and that categories consist solely of defining features. Among such overstretched categories I've seen argued: "conservative", "superhero", and "continent". Even seemingly-straightforward categories as "bachelor" ("unmarried man") run into problems (is a Catholic priest a bachelor?). In fact, the only categories that DON'T run seem to run into problems "at the edges"-- the only categories in which all instances really are cleanly "in" or "out"-- are (a) categories specifically designed as artificial and prescriptive, such as "military ranks" and (b) biological species (but only within a particular region and particular range in time-- once you look evolutionarily over enough time, even those "definitions" and "neat boundaries" break down).

[3] Indeed, I list "nonstandard categories" among my hobbies. Examples: The Nine Nations of North America, alternate categories/theories of "generations".
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags