(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-14 09:00 pm (UTC)
I would expect a lot of exclusionary blocs based on a perception (maybe mistaken, maybe not) that some group of people has more expensive health care needs. Exclude women of childbearing age and avoid all the expenses associated with having babies. Exclude people over 70 and reduce the risk of having to pay for extended care and multiple illnesses. Those are such big exclusions it's possible to imagine legal remedies. But how about excluding male homosexuals and immigrants, to reduce the bloc's risk of dealing with HIV infection? It may be a foolish tactic, but the Red Cross does it....
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags