(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-08 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
HSAs were first devised by people who thought the problem with healthcare costs was that Americans were overinsured. This is neither hyperbole nor exaggeration, and that faulty premise makes me distrustful of any solutions based off of it.

The notion appears to be if individuals are paying out-of-pocket they'll economize and that individual consumers can negotiate better prices than collective groups. [This cartoon is one of the more cynical criticisms I've seen...]

Group insurance balances out costs among a large patient pool. In the last several years, for-profit insurance has been trying to cherry-pick their clientele, to only attract the healthiest so they can avoid paying for the people who truly need the health insurance. My gut reaction is that this kind of plan appeals most to the young and healthy, who anticipate few health expenses. [What *does* happen if something major happens and the account gets overdrawn? SOL? Or will there be a safety net? Too cruel without the safety net, and if there is an adequate safety net, why do we need the HSAs?]


Ian, if you want to do more reading on this, I've got a mess of links for you, though I haven't sifted them for quality or authority, but we've got some further reading if you're interested.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags