Entry tags:
Oh. . . ONE more vaguely interesting thing to write about before sleeping. . .
This morning, as I was driving Lis to work, we were talking about the word "fish." I mentioned that I was surprised that there wasn't anything in English like "fisk" from the same root, except maybe a surname. (In Old English "sc" is pronounced as "sh" is in Modern English, so there are lots of words in English which came down as both "sh" and "sk" variations -- "shirt" and "skirt", "dish" and "disk", a "skipper" is one who runs a "ship", stuff like that. Since "fisc" is "fish" in OE, I was surprised that there isn't a "fisk" word of which I was aware).
Lis mentioned that, because of the f<-->p shift, "fisc" and "pisc" were the same word, which is neat. I don't know WHY f and p change into each other -- or b and v change into each other -- but they do. You can see it really obviously in Hebrew, but it's common among other Indo-European langages, too.
This evening, Lis looked up some of those words in the OED, and we found that "fiscal" comes from a word for a rush basket. I don't know that it has anything to do with fish.
Lis mentioned that, because of the f<-->p shift, "fisc" and "pisc" were the same word, which is neat. I don't know WHY f and p change into each other -- or b and v change into each other -- but they do. You can see it really obviously in Hebrew, but it's common among other Indo-European langages, too.
This evening, Lis looked up some of those words in the OED, and we found that "fiscal" comes from a word for a rush basket. I don't know that it has anything to do with fish.
no subject
Dunno.
no subject
But how did rush-baskets become associated with purses and treasuries?
no subject
And "skirt" seems to be from Old Norse.
no subject
no subject
This is the short version of this comment. I'm quite certain that
no subject
In Arabic
In Hebrew the 'S' and 'Sh' are also much closer to each other, than is English.
no subject
Actually, that's basically it. There are some sounds that have a tendency to turn into each other (q.v. sk <-> sh), and those are generally sounds that are articulated in the same place. In the case of f and p, most of the action is happening in the lips. There is probably, in some cases, a consonant between these two that is pronounced with just the lips together and sounds pretty much like f. Phonological Terminology Grab-Bag Fun Time: f is a labiodental (articulated with the lips and teeth) fricative (the airflow is mostly restricted); p is a labial (articulated with the lips) stop (the airflow is halted). Both are unvoiced.
b and p turn into each other like billy-o, as do other voiced/unvoiced pairs (s <-> z, k <-> g, the really complicated t <-> d, etc), but in ways usually heavily influenced by the surrounding sounds, so you have to dig a little more than with sk <-> sh to see that it's systematic, as virtually all sound changes that catch on are.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Growing up with this gives one an unfair advantage.