I suspect I'm not the only one who this happens to.
You are arguing on the Internet, because you are in an unwise mood. And someone makes a point with which you disagree. And you argue against it. And they argue back.
And their argument is JUST SO POORLY CONSTRUCTED that you find yourself having to type up and post a BETTER argument for THEIR side, so that you can argue against it. You find yourself creating logically consistent, well-formulated, and reasonable arguments for the thing you DON'T believe, just so that you have something solid to argue against.
So you end up having to have both sides of the argument, because NOBODY ELSE IS DOING IT RIGHT.
It's not just that "someone is wrong on the Internet." It's that people are "being wrong" wrong. You feel obligated to help them so that they can improve their arguments enough that they can achieve "wrong".
You are arguing on the Internet, because you are in an unwise mood. And someone makes a point with which you disagree. And you argue against it. And they argue back.
And their argument is JUST SO POORLY CONSTRUCTED that you find yourself having to type up and post a BETTER argument for THEIR side, so that you can argue against it. You find yourself creating logically consistent, well-formulated, and reasonable arguments for the thing you DON'T believe, just so that you have something solid to argue against.
So you end up having to have both sides of the argument, because NOBODY ELSE IS DOING IT RIGHT.
It's not just that "someone is wrong on the Internet." It's that people are "being wrong" wrong. You feel obligated to help them so that they can improve their arguments enough that they can achieve "wrong".