Feb. 18th, 2007

xiphias: (Default)
Got to see lots of great people, as per usual. Met Brother Guy Consolmagno, who is, in fact, every bit as cool, nice, smart, witty, funny, and just generally mensch-like as I'd been led to believe.

[livejournal.com profile] felis_sidus -- you'd really like him. I mean, if you were looking, and he wasn't a Jesuit monk, I'd totally try to set the two of you up. He's an astronomer for the Vatican, and is the curator of the Vatican's meteorite collection -- so, Mom, Dad, when we go to Italy and want to see Castel Gandalfo, he's the guy we want to contact. We asked him about it, and he said that Castel Gandalfo (where he lives and works six months of the year) isn't open to the public and that you have to be friends with someone to get in. Then he pointed out that he happens to be someone, and he's a pretty friendly fellow. So we'll email him later on and see what we can do.

He had a bunch of funny stories about being a religious scientist, and both the conflicts, but, more importantly, the utter lack of conflicts that he's encountered. He talked about how, just after he took up religious orders, he was talking to a fellow scientist who he'd known for a while, and mentioned that he was now a Jesuit, and the temperature in the room dropped about ten degrees. Okay, he'd be expecting this might happen, because of the anti-religious strain in science. After a while, the other scientist asked him if he'd always been Roman Catholic, and he said that, yes, his father was an Italian Catholic, hence "Consolmagno", and his mother was an Irish Catholic, and he'd, yes, ALWAYS been Catholic.

And the temperature in the room went right back to normal. See, the other scientist had always thought that Guy was Jewish, like him, so thought that "becoming a Jesuit" meant "rejecting Judaism". The whole "being a monk" thing, though -- THAT was totally cool.

In totally unrelated thoughts, except that they tangentially refer to religion and Italy, I was working more on my Purim Schpeil that I posted yesterday, and Lis mentioned the part of the Sistine Chapel which shows the Book of Esther has Haman being crucified, not hanged.

And I thought about this for a bit.

Now, I've always assumed that Haman and his wife and ten sons were hanged to death by the neck with a noose.

But does the language support crucifixion, as well?

I mean, it says that Haman had a fifty-cubit high (about 25 yards or 25 meters if you prefer -- those aren't the same, but "cubit" is a pretty approximate measurement anyway) "eitz" built on which Mordecai would be hung as an execution.

"Eitz" means, literally, "tree", but, in this case, means, "large wooden structure on which you hang someone in order to publicly execute him, or her." "Gallows" is a perfectly reasonable translation for this.

But would "crucifix" also be a reasonable translation for it? I don't have a Hebrew megillah, and my Hebrew's not good enough to tell, either. But what verb for "hang" do they use, and is it consistent with both being hanged from the neck until dead, AND with being hung off of a crucifix? What other usages of "eitz" do we have, and is it generally used, in this context, to mean "gallows"? Or could other execution styles be reasonable?

And, finally, what kind of execution styles were in vogue in the Persian Empire during that time?

My Hebrew is nowhere near good enough to tell, but I have a suspicion that Michaelangelo's interpretation may be a perfectly reasonable one.

If both interpretations of what "eitz" could be are plausible, it raises the question of why only the "gallows" interpretation has lasted in Jewish thought. Of course, a moment's thought provides a reasonable answer -- because if every year, Jews tended to portray an image of them having some guy crucified, it'd probably not end well for ANYBODY.
xiphias: (Default)
As many people have noticed, Boskone, as a convention, has a few . . . quirks.

Maybe just a touch of PTSD.

See, the moment which shaped the modern Boston science fiction convention scene was the Boskone From Hell in 1987, in which, for a number of factors which are set out pretty well in this essay/memoir, Things Blew The Fuck Up Bigtime.

Out of the shattered pieces, two new cons coalesced: in many ways, [livejournal.com profile] arisia is the real continuation of Boskone, and in many ways, Boskone is. For those who don't get the references in the name, by the way: "Boskone" is called "Boskone" because it's "Bos-Con." And because it's the bad guy civilization in the E. E. "Doc" Smith Lensmen novels.

"Arisia" is the good guy civilization.

So, the very name "Arisia" means, "Not Boskone." From the moment that Arisia existed, there was a feeling of some hostility between the two cons.

That feeling is basically gone now. I mean, hell, 1987 -- a lot of people who are now helping run cons weren't BORN back then. Me, I was just about to turn thirteen, and wouldn't be even remotely connected to fandom at ALL for at least another four years. A lot of people remember it, of course. Some of my friends were working that con. For at least one, that was his FIRST con.

And a number of people who still take it personally are still important in NESFA.

Boskone does not allow nicknames on badges.

That's not 100%, apparently. I found out that I COULD have had my badge name read, "Ian 'Xiphias' Osmond", although that would have been too long to fit on the badge.

("Wait. So you're saying that I COULD have a badge that said 'Ian Quote Xiphias Unquote Osmond', but not one that said 'Ian Osmond Carriage Return Xiphias'?" To be fair, there is ADDITIONALLY the issue that their badge printing setup won't handle two-line printing, but the impression I got was that, philosophically, that was more or less the case.)

And, of course, Hal Clement's badge said "Hal Clement", not "Harry Stubbs." I suspect that if Sting decided to buy a membership, he'd probably NOT have to have his badge read "Gordon Summner". Come to think of it, I can't remember if Phil Klass's badge says "Phil Klass", his birth name, or "William Tenn", the pen name under which he publishes the VAST majority of his science fiction. [livejournal.com profile] matociquala's badge says "Elizabeth Bear", which I am given to understand is not her birth name, which is apparently unpronounceable in any human tongue, and causes madness among any who hear it.

So, apparently, the "no nickname on your badge" rule is ONLY for people who haven't been published.

Apparently, there is basically one guy, or gal, who is influential in NESFA who has a particular problem with pseudonyms on badges. Folks who were telling us this don't want to mention who it is, which seems entirely fair to me -- it doesn't matter who it is, so why mention it? Twenty years ago, there were people who had fake names on badges, which meant that, when they caused problems, nobody could know who they were.

For me, it's not that big a deal. Yeah, I may personally think of myself as "Xiphias Gladius" inside my own head as much or more than I think of myself as "Ian Osmond", but I use both names, and most people who know me as "Xiphias Gladius" also know me as "Ian Osmond." I didn't have very many cases in which someone saw my name but didn't recognize me until someone nearby mentioned me as "Xiphias." Okay, it DID happen once, but my badge was turned around backwards and she couldn't read it, and she does know me by my real name.

Of course, I only recognized HER when she said she's [livejournal.com profile] cogitationitis. [livejournal.com profile] adrian_turtle got her first name down as "Adrian", but I had no clue what the last name on her badge meant, because it wasn't "Turtle". In all the years I've known her, I've known her as "Adrian Turtle". And [livejournal.com profile] shadesong's badge was 100% useless to one and all, since I'm not certain that even Elayna or [livejournal.com profile] yendi knows her legal name.

What is the point of a name badge?

One point is to be a ticket which states that the person wearing it has a non-transferable license to use the facilities of the convention. And the existence of pseudonymous badges in '87 apparently damaged the ability of the badges to be used for that purpose. When there are sixteen people running around with a badge name of "Gandalf", how do you tell which one was the one who sprayed the fire hose on the fifteenth floor? A badge which requires your legal name -- and, in fact, a name to which you can PROVE you are entitled to use with photo ID -- fulfills this purpose admirably.

Of course, such a badge COULD have a pseudonym in ADDITION to a legal name without diminishing its effectiveness. And that's, I think, where the PTSD comes in. I think that the '87 Boskone, and its aftermath, was so traumatic to the people running it that, now, a full two decades later, some of them STILL can't think of it rationally. I wouldn't be surprised if there are people who still have nightmares. Actually, I'd be surprised if there AREN'T.

Because the SECOND purpose of a name badge is to identify the wearer to other people who know the person by reputation, or by text communication. That's always been a vital part of science fiction fandom -- we've always known each other by the stories we write, the APAs we write, the letters to the editor we write. Usenet, and now blogs, are simply an extension of that. We know people by the names they sign to their writings, and then want to put faces to those names -- and to those personalities. After all, we know the people, and associate the people with the name. We just don't know what face and body are attached to the people. And the name badge helps clarify that.

I think that NESFA recognizes that, to a certain extent, which is why published authors get to use the name they primarily publish SF under.

But they don't recognize that the same thing applies to the rest of us who use names not on our birth certificates. Well, NESFA doesn't recognize it, institutionally. Many of the people who make up NESFA are perfectly well aware of that.

There are plenty of simple solutions to this problem -- get little white ribbons we can write our names on. Get buttons made up, like the one Lis asked [livejournal.com profile] chanaleh to make for me (it's ADORABLE -- you guys are both great.) Have one of the badges [livejournal.com profile] ckd has, which says "[livejournal.com profile] ckd" on it, and has his LJ default icon.

But, to me, solving it, while probably the more important question, isn't really the more interesting question -- the interesting question is why does this happen? Why does someone have such a problem with nicknames of non-professionals on badges?

And I really think the answer is PTSD. And I do have a great deal of sympathy for that person. But I also think that he or she deserves to have some sort of therapy for it -- psychiatry is beginning to have some kind of ability to treat it, and I can't imagine that it's a pleasant feeling. Whoever this person is who has the problem with badge names must deeply care about NESFA in general and Boskone in specific, worry excessively about the problems of the '87 Boskone reoccurring, and therefore be unable to think rationally about the actual dangers, and ways to allow pseudonyms without exposing the con to the same risks.

That CAN"T be comfortable for that person.

November 2018

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags