Well, in these cases, where the umps made the right ruling, it would be good. But what about those cases where the umps make a ruling which isn't backed up by instant replay -- in other words, the (objectively) wrong ruling? Or where the instant replay is inconclusive? Their rulings are supposed to be based on what the umps see, not on the instant replay.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-20 06:23 am (UTC)