they cannot afford to lower morale among their soldiers by ever letting them believe that they wouldn't move heaven and earth to get them back
Is this the problem with a mandatory/non-volunteer army? In America, we can say that soldiers volunteered and they know there job and they know the risk. But when it is mandatory, and people don't get that choice, doesn't the State have a larger responsibility to protect the people that are serving?
no subject
Is this the problem with a mandatory/non-volunteer army? In America, we can say that soldiers volunteered and they know there job and they know the risk. But when it is mandatory, and people don't get that choice, doesn't the State have a larger responsibility to protect the people that are serving?