Something Jmhm said made me think of this. . .

[xiphias]

In your opinion, which is more damaging to freedom?

1) A terrorist hijacking a plane and killing everyone on board.
2) A population getting used to the idea that going through a security checkpoint is a normal, unobjectionable part of daily life, and it is a reasonable expectation when traveling that government agents will search your belongings and person.

Comments

[lietya.livejournal.com]

I think it's a reasonable trade-off for the right to be treated as an honorable adult.

More to the point, though, it's how the question was phrased - the former is a threat to life and limb, to peace of mind, even to the stability of society if it's taken far enough. But it's not a threat to *freedom* (except insofar as freedom is endangered if society collapses, but I find that unlikely). The latter is a (willing) relinquishment of certain specific freedoms, and is therefore a larger threat to freedom as a whole, because if you can get people to adjust to giving up some freedoms, you can keep nibbling away until you've gotten them all.